Prelude 1.0

Lese­zeit: 13 Minu­ten

Hin­weis (15.02.2024): Letz­te Aktua­li­sie­rung am 23.09.2021 (Chan­ge­log). Die­se Sei­te wur­de durch eine aktu­el­le Ver­si­on abge­löst und steht hier bis auf Wei­te­res als Archiv für das AEL-Buch Ver­si­on 1.0 zur wei­te­ren Verfügung. 

Dwarfs on the Should­ers of Giants (trans­la­ted with DeeplPro) 

by Bern­hard von Char­tres around 1120

Why has the approach of Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship (AEL) been deve­lo­ped just now and why is it nee­ded right now? The first chap­ter pro­vi­des a brief ans­wer to this ques­ti­on and also dis­cus­ses the objec­ti­ves and struc­tu­re of the book, as well as the spe­cial deve­lo­p­ment process. 

Licence: Kers­tin Mayr­ber­ger. (2021). AEL-Buch-Cover [Online Bild­ma­te­ri­al], Lizenz CC BY 4.0 erstellt von Vec­to­ri­um –de.freepik.com https://de.freepik.com/psd/mockup. (2021). AEL-Buch-Cover [Online Bild­ma­te­ri­al], Lizenz CC BY 4.0 erstellt von Vec­to­ri­um –de.freepik.com https://de.freepik.com/psd/mockup.))

[Note: If the media file is not dis­play­ed cor­rect­ly in your brow­ser, all pod­cast chap­ters of the AEL book ver­si­on 1.0 can also be lis­ten­ed to direct­ly here.(ger­man version)]

Invitation

With Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship, I would like to invi­te you to take a step-by-step approach to the future of edu­ca­ti­on tog­e­ther with me – becau­se this future beg­ins today! Each and every one of us helps to shape this future – by acting or waiting. 

A call to Cou­ra­ge! 
The inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach of Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship is an offer and at the same time an invi­ta­ti­on to get star­ted tog­e­ther, step by step. A way of doing things in which a future-ori­en­ted nor­ma­li­ty can lie in a sove­reign ‘as well as’ of the fami­li­ar and the new. 

Con­cep­tu­al and empi­ri­cal fin­dings and expe­ri­en­ces from deve­lo­p­ment pro­jects and obser­va­tions have shown that, in addi­ti­on to sta­ble and solid cor­ner­sto­nes that are jus­ti­fia­ble and com­pre­hen­si­ble, the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor lacks fle­xi­bi­li­ty and open­ness to tru­ly new ide­as. The Coro­na-cri­sis impres­si­ve­ly reve­als that alter­na­ti­ve paths have long been nee­ded in the edu­ca­ti­on sys­tem in order to be able to act in an uncer­tain future. It takes cou­ra­ge to do things dif­fer­ent­ly and hop­eful­ly bet­ter in all are­as of (hig­her) education. 

Becau­se all we need is alre­a­dy here.
The state­ments in the AEL book, as I call it for short here, are the­r­e­fo­re shaped on the one hand by my con­vic­tion that things can work bet­ter in (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on than they do at the moment. And on the other hand, they are based on my pro­fes­sio­nal cer­tain­ty, which is groun­ded in many years of rese­arch, deve­lo­p­ment and exper­ti­se in the fields of edu­ca­ti­on, didac­tics and digi­tiza­ti­on. After all, many prac­ti­cal tri­als have alre­a­dy taken place in pro­jects and rese­arch, and solu­ti­on-ori­en­ted ide­as, con­cepts and theo­re­ti­cal know­ledge are available – inclu­ding in fields other than edu­ca­tio­nal sci­ence – to tack­le the topic dif­fer­ent­ly than befo­re and to find out what can be impro­ved and adopted on a broad scale. 

Thin­king out­side the box
Cri­ti­cal situa­tions are par­ti­cu­lar­ly indi­ca­ti­ve of weak points in the sys­tem, of are­as that have not yet been deve­lo­ped in a suf­fi­ci­ent­ly sta­ble man­ner. They make it clear what limits ari­se, i.e. whe­re the obs­ta­cles lie, in order to remain capa­ble of acting well in a cri­sis and, in the best case, to be capa­ble of deve­lo­p­ment. It is curr­ent­ly beco­ming clear that the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on in edu­ca­ti­on is still arri­ving and that it is being over­run by sud­den tech­no­lo­gi­cal moder­niza­ti­on rather than being able to con­tri­bu­te to didac­tic or pedago­gi­cal inno­va­ti­on, and even less so to making a name for its­elf in its own field. The cur­rent public (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on sys­tem has rea­ched its limits in its cur­rent struc­tu­re, with its respon­si­bi­li­ties and with the exis­ting solu­ti­ons. It can hard­ly keep up with the requi­red momen­tum. To over­co­me the­se limi­ta­ti­ons or break through rest­ric­tions, it can help to look bey­ond one’s own pro­fes­sio­nal hori­zons and to fol­low the clas­sic model of lear­ning and ask: 

How are others deal­ing with simi­lar chal­lenges in the pro­cess of digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on
? And to what ext­ent could this be trans­fer­red to the field of edu­ca­ti­on? What fits and what needs to be adapt­ed? How can it be imple­men­ted quick­ly and reason­ab­ly?

Urgen­cy
The fact that this text is being writ­ten in ear­ly 2021 at a time cha­rac­te­ri­zed by the pan­de­mic may be a spe­cial situa­ti­on. Howe­ver, agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship should not be unders­tood as some­thing that is only rele­vant during a cri­sis. After all, in view of the deve­lo­p­ments in the field of (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on in the cour­se of the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, I have felt an incre­asing sen­se of urgen­cy in recent years that things could be done differently. 

Walk the talk
This is whe­re my moti­va­ti­on grew to com­bi­ne inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry per­spec­ti­ves and the con­nec­tion bet­ween con­tent in the fields of edu­ca­ti­on, agi­li­ty and lea­der­ship in the cour­se of the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor with its con­se­quen­ces into an inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry approach cal­ledAgi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship and to deve­lop a frame­work from it. Strict­ly spea­king, the cur­rent coro­na pan­de­mic has now beco­me an acce­le­ra­tor for this pro­ject. It encou­ra­ged me to start sha­ring my initi­al thoughts in wri­ting and spea­king in 2020 and to enga­ge in joint dis­cus­sion. I could­n’t shake it off. 

So ins­tead of having a com­ple­te­ly finis­hed and tho­rough­ly thought-out book on Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship, as is actual­ly typi­cal for sci­ence, by 2022, fol­lo­wing a com­pre­hen­si­ve sche­du­le, a first com­pre­hen­si­ve text is now being crea­ted in an agi­le and ite­ra­ti­ve way in an open pro­cess cha­rac­te­ri­zed by con­stant exch­an­ge. This first ver­si­on of the AEL book stands for ver­si­on 1.0 – walk the talk. 

Contextualisiation

Befo­re the fol­lo­wing chap­ters of the book gra­du­al­ly ela­bo­ra­te on the Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship approach with its inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry con­text in more depth and with more dif­fe­ren­tia­ti­on, I would like to pro­vi­de a brief initi­al con­text here. 

The Gol­den Cir­cle by Simon Sinekser­ves as an inspi­ra­ti­on for the fol­lo­wing struc­tu­re. And so, at this point, the three ques­ti­ons he has iden­ti­fied as cen­tral to suc­cessful ven­tures are brought to the point, ans­we­red or, to quo­te Simon Sinek: what is the­das Why, How und What of Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Leadership? 

Why – What is Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship rele­vant for? What is the point?
Sus­tainable impro­ve­ments in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor are neces­sa­ry, as the cur­rent cri­sis situa­ti­on has made abun­dant­ly clear.
We are curr­ent­ly expe­ri­en­cing social con­di­ti­ons that hard­ly allow us any time to talk or phi­lo­so­phi­ze about the future of edu­ca­ti­on becau­se tech­no­lo­gi­cal chan­ges are pro­gres­sing so quick­ly and the ongo­ing pan­de­mic requi­res prompt decis­i­ons that it is no lon­ger pos­si­ble to deve­lop ela­bo­ra­ted recom­men­da­ti­ons for action. In fact, we are in the midst of the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor and it is important to shape the future today and to give our­sel­ves room and space to act again so that we do not remain reac­ti­ve. Becau­se today’s lear­ners — regard­less of the field — are the actors of tomor­row. They will have to tack­le and sol­ve the fore­seeable and as yet unknown pro­blems of the (near) future. To do so, they need pro­fes­sio­nal and inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry skills, know­ledge and, abo­ve all, con­fi­dence in their indi­vi­du­al and coll­ec­ti­ve abili­ty to act in lifel­ong lear­ning. Expe­ri­en­ces as well as socia­liza­ti­on pro­ces­ses are hel­pful here, which, in addi­ti­on to the acqui­si­ti­on of pro­fes­sio­nal skills and know­ledge in terms of the deve­lo­p­ment of indi­vi­dua­li­ty and per­so­na­li­ty for­ma­ti­on, make it clear how one can learn to deal with mista­kes, think cri­ti­cal­ly and act crea­tively, as well as how to orga­ni­ze ones­elf and keep an eye on the big picture. 

How – Whe­re do we go from here?
Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship stands for a pos­si­ble Wie, i.e. a pos­si­ble way to meet the social respon­si­bi­li­ty of good edu­ca­ti­on through the appro­pria­te design of good lear­ning and edu­ca­tio­nal con­texts under the con­di­ti­ons of digi­ta­liza­ti­on and digitality. 

The approach shows the frame­work for how we can gra­du­al­ly and sen­si­bly shape edu­ca­tio­nal con­di­ti­ons and con­texts in various for­mal, infor­mal and non-for­mal are­as in orderto be able to act in the future.

How is Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship to be unders­tood?
The Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship approach stands for spe­ci­fic agi­le lea­der­ship in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor and for a stra­tegy for action. The aim is to deve­lop a con­sis­tent and theo­re­ti­cal­ly sound trans­di­sci­pli­na­ry framework. 

Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship com­bi­nes agi­le values and prin­ci­ples and encou­ra­ges the hand­ling of orga­niza­tio­nal and per­so­nal ambi­dex­teri­ty in order to be able to act con­fi­dent­ly bet­ween hier­ar­chies and networks.The focus is on embra­cing a “both-and” approach in the com­ple­xi­ty of diver­se decis­i­on-making and action opti­ons, balan­cing and endu­ring it while also wan­ting to, and ther­eby reve­al­ing con­nec­tions bet­ween dua­li­ties. An Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der does not stand for a hier­ar­chi­cal posi­ti­on or func­tion, but for a role with a cor­re­spon­ding atti­tu­de and mindset. 

AEL pro­vi­des a frame­work for wan­ting and being able to act respon­si­bly under uncer­tain con­tex­tu­al con­di­ti­ons in the edu­ca­ti­on sector.

What – What does it actual­ly take?
The What brings alre­a­dy exis­ting and fami­li­ar per­spec­ti­ves from the cor­po­ra­te con­text to bear: agi­le lea­der­ship and ambi­dex­teri­ty. Edu­ca­tio­nal orga­niza­ti­ons, the various edu­ca­tio­nal sec­tors and indi­vi­du­als are equal­ly rele­vant. For the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor, it repea­ted­ly beco­mes clear how cen­tral the role of edu­ca­tio­nal spe­cia­lists and tea­chers is in the various are­as. Be it in terms of rela­ti­onship work, their func­tion as a role model and the expe­ri­en­ces they enable lear­ners to have by crea­ting meaningful lear­ning envi­ron­ments. As a first step, agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship starts with the peo­p­le and stake­hol­ders in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor for joint work in and on the edu­ca­ti­on sys­tem. This means that per­so­nal ambi­dex­teri­ty and orga­niza­tio­nal ambi­dex­teri­ty are equal­ly important. 

What makes agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship work?
Per­so­nal ambi­dex­teri­ty, refer­red to here as #Ambidextrie4me, stands for a pos­si­ble prac­ti­ce of agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship in the cour­se of digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on. Here, an edu­ca­tio­nal prac­ti­ce-rela­ted con­cept is deve­lo­ped that includes action-ori­en­ted and reflec­ti­ve methods and tools to streng­then one’s own media-rela­ted pro­fes­sio­na­lism in the field of edu­ca­ti­on. #Ambidextrie4me con­tri­bu­tes to being agi­le and is cha­rac­te­ri­zed by agi­le prac­ti­ces in the sen­se of doing agi­le. Agi­le values and prin­ci­ples in par­ti­cu­lar ser­ve as a refe­rence for this, as does a focus on coa­ching skills in order to streng­then one’s own agi­le lea­der­ship skills through (self-)learning oppor­tu­ni­ties and training. 

Peo­p­le are nee­ded who incre­asing­ly enga­ge with and deve­lop #Ambidextrie4me so that agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship can con­tri­bu­te to the abili­ty to act in the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on of the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor and the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor can deve­lop well. Appro­pria­te trai­ning and deve­lo­p­ment oppor­tu­ni­ties are nee­ded to streng­then #Ambidextrie4me.

Lens
Agi­le edu­ca­tio­nal lea­der­ship is one pos­si­ble way in which the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor can deve­lop in a future-pro­of and effec­ti­ve man­ner in the cour­se of the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on and react more quick­ly. The approach descri­bes a pro­ce­du­re along agi­le values and prin­ci­ples and, with the help of appro­pria­te edu­ca­tio­nal and deve­lo­p­ment offers, forms a frame­work for the action-ori­en­ted and refle­xi­ve deve­lo­p­ment of an #Ambidextrie4me of actors. 

With the Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship approach, the book aims to offer a sui­ta­ble frame­work for joint, net­work­ed and ite­ra­ti­ve action in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor. At the same time, with the refe­rence points of edu­ca­ti­on, agi­li­ty and lea­der­ship in the con­text of digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, this book also repres­ents an edu­ca­tio­nal sci­ence reflec­tion in the form of an essay on the (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor in the cur­rent era. 

About the book

This book should not even exist yet. After all, is it pos­si­ble to publish some­thing that is not yet com­ple­te­ly finis­hed and will the­r­e­fo­re be fur­ther deve­lo­ped, impro­ved, rear­ran­ged, dis­card­ed and sup­ple­men­ted in a par­al­lel process? ? 

But what a year 2020 was! 

Dif­fe­rent times, dif­fe­rent moti­va­tions and ulti­m­ate­ly dif­fe­rent decis­i­ons with regard to ever­y­thing that is curr­ent­ly hap­pe­ning in our socie­ty. And so a free­ly and open­ly acces­si­ble book on the Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship approach is now being crea­ted online, ite­ra­tively and transparently. 

So yes, it is possible. 

Ambi­ti­on 
Figu­ra­tively spea­king, the aim of this book is to pick up exis­ting per­spec­ti­ves and approa­ches like threads and tie them tog­e­ther to form a strong rope in the form of Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship. Such a rope could pro­vi­de sup­port to move step by step in and with the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor through the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on, espe­ci­al­ly when the ground feels shaky or the dyna­mic winds of chan­ge pick up. 

This book builds on what is alre­a­dy known, expands and sup­ple­ments what alre­a­dy exists and deve­lo­ps new ide­as and approa­ches for the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor. The Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship approach thus sees its­elf in the truest sen­se as a dwarf on the should­ers of giants, from which the inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry field can be view­ed and sur­vey­ed more broadly. 

Struc­tu­re 
The fol­lo­wing sub­ject are­as and chap­ters are curr­ent­ly plan­ned for the first com­ple­te ver­si­on of the book – Ver­si­on 1.0.

The­se chap­ters will gra­du­al­ly be published online over the next few weeks and will then be available for com­ment. The book will only show its struc­tu­re and out­line at the end of ver­si­on 1.0 in June 2021, even if it may appear dif­fer­ent­ly here on the web­site for tech­ni­cal reasons – becau­se it is open whe­re fur­ther impul­ses will lead the wri­ting process. 

Agi­le crea­ti­on pro­cess
As the sub­ject mat­ter sug­gests, the web-based text is crea­ted dyna­mi­cal­ly, ite­ra­tively and in sprint cycles along agi­le prin­ci­ples. In view of the digi­tal trans­for­ma­ti­on in the edu­ca­ti­on sec­tor, it seems more than appro­pria­te to make new ide­as and con­side­ra­ti­ons acces­si­ble, share them, obtain feed­back and impro­ve them as quick­ly as pos­si­ble under dyna­mic conditions. 

Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship is an approach that aims to com­bi­ne theo­ry, prac­ti­ce, trans­fer and empi­ri­cism in equal mea­su­re and estab­lishes inter­di­sci­pli­na­ry links. Abo­ve all, this includes brin­ging tog­e­ther the spe­cia­list per­spec­ti­ves of edu­ca­tio­nal sci­ence or edu­ca­tio­nal sci­ence with tho­se from eco­no­mics and com­pu­ter sci­ence. The fact that it also includes per­spec­ti­ves from socio­lo­gy, phi­lo­so­phy, com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on and media stu­dies and psy­cho­lo­gy in places is obvious when it comes to the topic of agi­li­ty, lea­der­ship and the edu­ca­tio­nal context. 

The AEL book, with its diver­si­ty of per­spec­ti­ves, will the­r­e­fo­re deve­lop in con­cen­tric cir­cles around an initi­al core, ver­si­on 1.0, as a start­ing point and will be expan­ded and impro­ved from the­re. The aim of the first ver­si­on is to pre­sent an over­view of the cen­tral rela­ti­onships and to find out whe­re the approach fits well for whom and whe­re the­re are still open ques­ti­ons that should be dealt with in more detail. In the sen­se of a “T‑shape”, fur­ther ver­si­ons can then go into grea­ter depth and fur­ther net­wor­king on indi­vi­du­al topics and named terms. Each ver­si­on of the AEL book only ever repres­ents an inte­rim sta­tus, with the final point or under­stan­ding of “Done” cor­re­spon­ding to the respec­ti­ve objec­ti­ves of the sprint cycles. 

A note to begin with!  
On the one hand, it is easy to name you, the rea­ders, i.e. the tar­get group for the sub­ject mat­ter pre­sen­ted here, becau­se it can only be assu­med that you are inte­res­ted in edu­ca­ti­on and the future of edu­ca­ti­on within and out­side edu­ca­tio­nal insti­tu­ti­ons and orga­niza­ti­ons in the broa­dest sense. 

On the other hand, it is equal­ly dif­fi­cult to anti­ci­pa­te how broad your actu­al inte­rests are bey­ond sub­ject boun­da­ries and various fields of action in the edu­ca­tio­nal con­text and whe­re the­se could pre­su­ma­b­ly lie across disci­pli­nes in the trans­fer bet­ween theo­ry, con­cept and prac­ti­ce. It will the­r­e­fo­re be the case that in a first ver­si­on of Agi­le Edu­ca­tio­nal Lea­der­ship, it will pro­ba­b­ly not be pos­si­ble to take on and for­mu­la­te every spe­cia­list per­spec­ti­ve in a com­ple­te­ly satis­fac­to­ry way for you as a rea­der. But this is also in the natu­re of a first ver­si­on, which will sub­se­quent­ly be impro­ved in an agi­le sen­se in ite­ra­ti­ve loops. 

In order to be able to include your inte­rests at an ear­ly stage, I work with the tar­get image of an MVP – a Mini­mal Via­ble Pro­duct. This MVP is alre­a­dy shown open­ly during the deve­lo­p­ment pro­cess and is the­r­e­fo­re also open and free­ly acces­si­ble for your input. 

The online text made acces­si­ble here matures through the pos­si­bi­li­ty of a time­ly public review via the DUA-Blog. The­re you have the oppor­tu­ni­ty to com­ment, argue, sup­ple­ment or pro­vi­de other impul­ses from theo­ry and practice. 

The feed­back and comm­ents are review­ed and ans­we­red edi­to­ri­al­ly by the enti­re DUA pro­ject team and are incor­po­ra­ted into ongo­ing revi­si­ons and the back­log. This also means that the ver­si­on curr­ent­ly being read here and now may alre­a­dy have been chan­ged and expan­ded tomor­row. The­se are opti­ons of an online medi­um from which the deve­lo­p­ment pro­cess of the enti­re work should bene­fit. The first com­ple­te ver­si­on of a free­ly and open­ly acces­si­ble online book will be available in June 2021. Ide­al­ly, we will be able to com­ple­te the next, second and impro­ved ver­si­on by sum­mer 2021. 

In this respect, I would like to appeal to you as rea­ders to enga­ge with this diver­si­ty of per­spec­ti­ves bet­ween theo­ry and prac­ti­ce – espe­ci­al­ly tho­se that at first glan­ce seem for­eign or fur­ther remo­ved from your pre­vious pro­fes­sio­nal point of view – as well as to be open to the ongo­ing deve­lo­p­ment process. 

Ack­now­ledgments 
In order for the book to be online in a first ver­si­on by June 2021 or to be “Done” in the sen­se of the Defi­ni­ti­on of Done (DoD) of ver­si­on 1.0 of the book, sup­port around the actu­al wri­ting pro­cess was and is neces­sa­ry, for which I am very grateful. 

In terms of the book’s con­tent and the way it was writ­ten, many inten­si­ve dis­cus­sions with col­le­agues and other inte­res­ted par­ties on the future of (hig­her) edu­ca­ti­on were and still are part of the pro­cess. I have also recei­ved a varie­ty of smal­ler and lar­ger impul­ses, some­ti­mes even sur­pri­sing cont­acts, via social networks. 

Howe­ver, the most important sup­port I curr­ent­ly recei­ve is from the coope­ra­ti­on in our DUA pro­ject team, which is very acti­ve in rese­arch, editing and pro­ofre­a­ding as well as tech­ni­cal imple­men­ta­ti­on. We would not be able to rea­li­ze the AEL book in its pre­sent form, in addi­ti­on to other tasks in the DUA pro­ject, in terms of con­tent, ope­ra­ti­ons and tech­no­lo­gy, wit­hout the shared desi­re to test our­sel­ves in agi­le working, get­ting invol­ved in new tech­ni­cal and pro­fes­sio­nal things, fin­ding crea­ti­ve solu­ti­ons and not wit­hout the enorm­ous and com­pe­tent ener­gy within our team. 

Thank you.

 

Scroll to Top